How I View Reviewing
I’ve never been a reviewer.
I joined Goodreads so I can keep track of the books I’ve read and when I
finish them. I don’t review on
Amazon. I’ve let my NetGalley
participation lapse. Here on the YA
Muses, we call our monthly feature a Book Blog, not a review. We talk
about books. We talk about what books
we’re reading, why we’re reading them and what we like about them.
It’s not that I don’t have opinions. I have strong feelings, likes and
dislikes. I can give good, clear reasons
for why I think one book has literary merit or another is a cracking good read,
but perhaps not award-winning prose. But
I have different reasons for loving a book (or not loving it). There have been brilliantly-written,
loudly-acclaimed novels that I have had trouble finishing because I didn’t like
the characters. And I adore a good,
fast, funny mystery as much as the next person, whether or not Kirkus would
give it a star.
So why do I worry when my books get reviewed? Why do I take it so personally when an
industry review is less than glowing? Or
when a Goodreads reader slams it for being what it is and not what they wanted
to read? Why do I agonize over the
one-star ratings?
I’ve done the trick where I find a book that I absolutely
loved, that gets glowing comments from other writers and many readers, and I
read the one-star reviews for that book.
I completely disagree with what those reviewers said. I respect their opinions, I certainly don’t
think they’re unintelligent or misinformed.
I can often see why they say the things they do, I just don’t
agree. And this makes me feel better.
For about a minute.
For a while last year, I believed that the most critical
reviews of GILT revealed the truth about it.
That it truly was all the
things these readers said. That my own
vision of my book was catastrophically wrong and that I was too poor a writer
to make the story I intended to write
shine through. That somehow, I had
failed.
It took me a long time to be able to accept my book for what
it is. To love my book for the reasons
that I love it. To remember why I wrote it and what I
intended and then stand back and let other people read their own interpretation
of it. I can’t hover over them and say, but don’t you see? This sentence encapsulates the entire point
of the novel! I have to let them
enjoy it—or not—based on their own experiences, their own backgrounds, their
own desires and their own visions. I
have to let go, because once my book is released into the world, it is not my
own anymore. It belongs to every reader,
and I have to let them do with it what they may.
My second book is about to go out into the world. I love this book, too. It was harder to write; it came from a deeper
place emotionally. I lived with these
characters in my head like they were parts of me and my best friends. It will hurt when people don’t love it—don’t
love them—as much as I do. I hope I have
managed to grow a thicker skin. I need
to appreciate (and believe!) the reviews that are glowing. I need to honor
the readers who reach out to me personally to tell me how my book touched them
on a deep, emotional level.
But I need to let every reader experience the book in their
own way—like it or not.
5 comments
Okay so here I come with one of my favorite movie quotes, "It's easier to believe the bad stuff." Pretty Woman Julia Roberts.
And it is. It sticks with us and drowns out all those four and five star reviews all the compliments, anything nice anyone has ever said about your writing. (not that I have any experience with that I'm just putting myself in your shoes).
And then, I'm pretty sure one of you have stated that even JK Rowling has negative reviews for her series and was rejected many times by big publishing houses. So try to remember these are opinions, especially on Goodreads. And just enjoy the release of your book.
Heather
Thank you, Heather! I think a lot of us have that problem--bad stuff sticks. But you're right, the good stuff should win in the end.
I read GILT and loved it!
I've found that with nearly everything - be it a hair product, a pair of shoes, a book - there will always be someone for whom it just doesn't work. And that's fine. I've learned to skip over the overly negative book reviews and read mostly the positive ones, because for the most part it seems the negative reviewers are just plain nitpicky!
Thank you, Cassandra! And bravo, being able to skip the negative reviews! I'm still working on that one. It definitely helps to remember that I love my characters, and nothing can change that!
I think all Goodreads reviewers should start with this premise: It's not my book, I didn't write it, here is the story the WRITER is telling, whether I like the story or not. Followed by: here is what I like, what I don't and why (within the context of the story). Way too many diatribes take place on Goodreads, in my opinion.
But perhaps any art-of-reviewing (major to minor) is not the point of Goodreads...
Post a Comment